This week’s question is all about irrationality. We’re asking you to look within yourself for those irrational literary loves, hates and habits. Is there something strange and irrational about the way you read and/or write? Do you love something you know is crap, or hate something you know is of quality?
——
Me personally, I can’t stand anything written in first person. There is just no personality that I don’t find unbelievably annoying when presented through a first-person perspective. To me, confidence reads like cockiness and misery reads like sooking when it’s the characters themselves explaining how they feel.
“The Name of The Wind” is a book that I particularly dislike for this reason. It was the first hardcover I’d ever bought without having read it beforehand. I flicked through the first couple chapters while in the bookstore and grew more and more intrigued. It wasn’t until I got the book home that I found it swaps to first person at the beginning of chapter eight for reasons beyond me. I continued reading for a little bit but very soon came to a quote from the main character that was so dripping in braggadocio that after barfing in my mouth I stopped reading and left the book to collect dust in my cupboard; stashed away in the hope that I one day get over this irrational hatred and can enjoy a story that despite my whining, did actually sound fascinating.
“I have been called Kvothe the Bloodless, Kvothe the Arcane, and Kvothe Kingkiller. I have earned those names. Bought and paid for them.
But I was brought up as Kvothe. My father once told me it meant ‘to know.’ I have, of course, been called many other things. Most of them uncouth, although very few were unearned. I have stolen princesses back from sleeping barrow kings. I burned down the town of Trebon. I have spent the night with Felurian and left with both my sanity and my life. I was expelled from the University at a younger age than most people are allowed in. I tread paths by moonlight that others fear to speak of during day. I have talked to Gods, loved women, and written songs that make the minstrels weep.
You may have heard of me.”
- Kvothe
(The Name of The Wind)
Feel free to answer in the comments below, or create your own post with the hashtag #irrationality
Art Credit
Daria - MTV Series(1997)
![Weekly Question - Irrationality-[C]This week’s question is all about irrationality. We’re asking you to look within yourself](https://image.staticox.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpm1.aminoapps.vertvonline.info%2F7329%2Fb7e5ba758a0f56ba6e4e2727797fdc3038e16022r1-500-351v2_hq.jpg)
Comments (6)
I think 1st person makes perfect sense in a detective story, where the reader wants to be the detective and try to solve the mystery alongside the detective. And so, if the writer doesn't cheat, the reader has the same clues the 1st person narrator/detective has. Of course, you can achieve this with third person (limited to one character) as well without any issues.
Personally, I hate when the writer switches between 1st & 3rd without considering the flow of story. Sometimes, I don't like it even when it is done in different books of the same series.
Also, I don't like 2nd person narration much. But I guess, it's not widely used anyways.
I don't always like first person either... Not my favourite point of view when reading... Usually
It sounds like a Journol Writing about the People from the past is Anceint and Preserved and it was Recorded down by so many by the Wise People and Seers. And the Scribes. Now it's up to the Readers and writers to Find from where and When. It took place.
I have a similar love/hate relationship with 1st person stories. I don't mind them, but at the same time, it irritates me when the 1st person narrator tells us how another character feels based off of how they look or act. You don't know for certain how the other character feels. We are in one character’s head only. Tell us what the other characters do and describe their tone of voice but don't assume your main character knows how they feel because he/she doesn't.
For the most part I agree, though there are a couple cases that come to mind where a character could genuinely know how another character feels or at least believe they do and so it wouldn’t be out of place for it to be written as if they knew it. A character could be particularly perceptive when it comes to human behaviour like Sherlock Holmes, or any characters close enough with one another could have that innate understanding of each other.
Ik this has nothing to do with the actual post, butttt
"Is your cutlery holding an edge? Or going over one? Diary of a Mad Steak Knife, TONIGHT on Sick Sad World!"