Back it again with Blue Helm slander. So what's going on? Oh the usual, blue helms being the pedophiles that they always been, but this time, they aren't even subtle about it anymore. Now, I know some of y'all want a TL;DR. Well TL;DR, the UN is making mass decriminalization efforts. This includes decriminalizing drugs completely. Now if that was the only thing those heretics were decriminalizing, I wouldn't be making this post. They are also trying to decriminalize ADULT SEX WITH MINORS! I'm not even kidding. I know some of y'all are gonna read the article and be like "🤓 :point_up: ackshully, it doesn't say anything about decriminalizing pedophilia, you're spreading misinformation",l (I'm looking at you Shadow and Mischief). Well, that's because the meat is in the related document. And since some of y'all ain't gonna the document, here's a related screenshot:
I shit you not this came from the document.
:point_up: 🤓: "Well ackshully, all this is doing is decriminalizing sex with minors if the minor consented"
Bitch, minors can't consent. There is a reason why pedophilia is bad and scrutinized so much. So no, this is, in fact, decriminalizing pedophilia. Don't try to sugarcoat it.
Comments (15)
I don’t think you reached the correct conclusion when reading this section.
First paragraph is just talking about how any kind of sex between people of different genders and races should be allowed.
Second paragraph is talking about how there should be no exceptions to a countries minimal age rule. I.e no matter the religion or sex the minimal age law stays the same and is prosecuted the same if broken.
The third paragraph does not talk about adults having sex with minors, it’s talking about sexual conduct between two or more minors. The paragraph goes on to talk about how sex between two minors can be consensual and how both minors should be involved in the decisions affecting them.
Though there is always a possibility that my assumption and your assumption are both wrong. Therefore I am emailing the ICJ for clarification regarding that section.
So basically, they are trying to protect relationships, but snuck in pedophilia "relationships"
Considering that some states in the US are still protecting Child Marriage, it's clear that despite public rejection to the idea, old leaders and groups are desperate to protect their old ways.
Reply to: :us: 🂡 ɥɔʇıl⅁ (sublime) 🂡 :us:
You're the one focused on left-wingers when it is organizations that made and are backing this. With the main ones being from Switzerland. Not a US political party as mentioned in my previous blog. So to shift the angle to it being "US leftists legalize pedophilia" is a lie that you are trying to pull.
Reply to: :us: 🂡 ɥɔʇıl⅁ (sublime) 🂡 :us:
You are litterly whining to me to make a post about this bill and shift to it being about the left-wing.
Reply to: :us: 🂡 ɥɔʇıl⅁ (sublime) 🂡 :us:
Im not the one asking you to make a post to make up lies because of bias.
Totally not possibly related. Nope, not at all.
I’m confused on what context or comparison you’re drawing. I get it’s a meme, and I’m not disagreeing I’m just confused