If people think that Michael is the crying child, what happened to the older brother? Did he just, like, die?
Just a thought
Shadow Bonnie 07/25/18
26
32
Likes (26)
Comments (32)
Likes (26)
Like 26
67
3
From Shadow Bonnie
Hey baby~
120
40
Featured post
:love_letter: One True Pair Event :love_letter:
![amino-•⋅⊰∙∘☽ ғʟɪsᴋᴀ ɢʀᴀᴠɪᴛʏ ☾∘∙⊱⋅• [𝚅𝙰/𝚅𝙸]-78045350](https://image.staticox.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpm1.aminoapps.vertvonline.info%2F9413%2F4d48cff5b217af99aa2864b500a2be7abc43404dr1-1366-2048_00.jpg)
104
2
Featured post
:wolf: I am the best. :nail_care:
86
1
Featured post
Comments (32)
Sooo mike is the CRYING CHILD I think wrong the crying child’s name is ben -w-
Reply to: :rose: Manglefox :cherry_blossom:
Well, I don't believe Michael is the crying child, that's just a part of matpats theory currently. The crying child has no cannon name.
Ok, here we go. This is a theory I thought of. If fredbear is controlled by william afton (what we all know I guess) than it could be that william killed the older brother too, a random kid and then inserted a robot inside of him which william can controll. There is a little bit of proof, because with the cutscenes in sl where we see micheal change, his eyes get a white dot over time and his skin colour turns darker and darker till it’s purple. We see that same change with the older brother. He first had (when he jumped behind the tv for example) paler skin and black eyes. When he was in the restaurant where the accident happened his eyes were black with a white dot, so he is changing too because there is a robot inside of him. If you think that is bullshit, Matpat said that Charlie was AI so it is possible. And with the colors and details, we all know scott doesn’t do coincidences. And if that’s true Micheal could be put together by also becoming AI william created, and miraculously survive the scooper. I have more, but that’s not nessecarily for this theory. Lol
Reply to: Shadow Bonnie
Oh ok, maybe I should be the one not spoiling the silver eyes
Reply to: Bonnieface666
Pfft, nah, doesn't worry me at all. I know how all three of the books end, and I know bits of the story, just never read them.
Reply to: Shadow Bonnie
Oh ok
I disagree with that theory I felt like matpat went way to far
Reply to: Bonnieface666
Agreed. I was just curious as to what people who believe the theory had to say about the older brother.
Reply to: Shadow Bonnie
Yeah that theory makes no sense
this is one of the reasons why i believe the bully is michael, plus the child dies at the end of fnaf 4 so it wouldn’t really make sense.
Are refrencing this theory?
Reply to: Shadow Bonnie
Yes dat iz da wan
Reply to: A random fnaf fan
Yup
Reply to: Shadow Bonnie
Ive been thinking since in one of his theories in "What's inside the BOX" he mentione five/four (srry cant ) things put into one like the quote that scott made "4 games 1 story" the story of michael (the Crying child in this scenario) maybe the brother ran away...Question mark